Fallacy: The Islamic critique often argues that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is a form of polytheism, contradicting the monotheism of true Abrahamic faith.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists have historically clarified that the Trinity is not polytheism but a mystery of one God in three persons, co-eternal and consubstantial. The Nicene Creed (325 AD) explicitly affirmed this, stating that Christians believe in “one God” with three distinct persons who share the same divine essence.

2. The Bible is Corrupted (Tahrif):

Fallacy: Some Islamic teachings assert that the Bible has been altered or corrupted over time (known as tahrif), making it unreliable compared to the Qur’an.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists have historically countered this claim by emphasizing the reliability of the biblical manuscripts. The Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient manuscripts have shown remarkable consistency over millennia. Additionally, early Islamic sources sometimes acknowledge the integrity of the Bible during Muhammad’s time, complicating later claims of corruption.

Fallacy: Islam teaches that Jesus (Isa) is a prophet, but not divine, rejecting the Christian belief in the divinity of Christ.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists point to biblical passages where Jesus is worshiped (e.g., John 1:1, John 20:28, and Colossians 2:9), asserting that the New Testament consistently presents Jesus as God incarnate. Early church councils, such as the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD), affirmed Christ’s dual nature as fully God and fully man.

Fallacy: The Qur’an (Surah 4:157) claims that Jesus was not crucified, but that it was made to appear so, rejecting the central Christian belief in the crucifixion and resurrection.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists have pointed to both biblical and extra-biblical sources (e.g., Josephus, Tacitus) that affirm the historical reality of Jesus’ crucifixion. The resurrection is defended as a historical event based on eyewitness testimony recorded in the Gospels.

Fallacy: Some Islamic scholars claim that the Bible predicts the coming of Muhammad, often citing passages like Deuteronomy 18:18 or John 14:16.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists argue that these passages do not refer to Muhammad but to Jesus or the Holy Spirit. Deuteronomy 18:18 is seen as a prophecy fulfilled in Christ, while John 14:16 refers to the Holy Spirit, the “Comforter” or “Advocate,” not another prophet.

Fallacy: Some Muslims believe that the Qur’an, as the final revelation, abrogates or supersedes the Bible, making the earlier scriptures obsolete.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists assert that God’s word, as revealed in the Bible, is eternal and unchanging. They argue that the message of the Gospel is final and sufficient for salvation, as affirmed by scriptures like Hebrews 1:1-2, which speaks of God’s final revelation through His Son, Jesus Christ.

Fallacy: A common Islamic critique is that Christianity was corrupted by Paul, who supposedly deviated from the original teachings of Jesus.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists respond by showing that Paul’s teachings are consistent with those of Jesus, as reflected in the Gospels. They also point out that the early church, including those who knew Jesus personally, accepted Paul as an apostle and acknowledged his writings as authoritative scripture.

Fallacy: Islam rejects the doctrine of original sin, arguing that it is unjust to hold all of humanity accountable for the sin of Adam and Eve.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists explain that original sin refers to the fallen state of humanity, not to personal guilt for Adam’s sin. They argue that this doctrine highlights the need for redemption through Jesus Christ, who offers salvation to all through His sacrifice.

Fallacy: Some Islamic critiques accuse Christianity of idolatry, particularly regarding the veneration of the cross, saints, and icons.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists clarify that veneration of the cross and saints is not idolatry but a way of honoring the instruments and examples of God’s grace. Worship is directed to God alone, and the use of icons or images is meant to inspire faith, not to replace God.

Fallacy: Islam teaches that each person is responsible for their own deeds, rejecting the idea that one person’s sacrifice (Jesus) can atone for the sins of others.

  Rebuttal: Christian apologists defend the doctrine of atonement by pointing to the sacrificial system in the Old Testament, which prefigures Christ’s ultimate sacrifice. They argue that Jesus’ atonement is an act of divine love and justice, fulfilling the law and providing a way for humanity to be reconciled with God.

  Conclusion

These fallacies are rooted in fundamental differences between Islamic and Christian theology. Christian apologists have historically addressed these critiques by clarifying theological doctrines, appealing to scriptural and historical evidence, and emphasizing the continuity and coherence of the Christian faith from its inception to the present day. And this is JUST the tip of the iceberg